Some metadata fields permit multiple values in them, comma- or semi-colon-separated usually. Others allow the duplication of fields as separate records.
How to know which is which? Is the type distinction documented in ExifTool?
- J
The ExifTool tag name documentation indicates List-type tags, if that's what you mean.
But technically, List-type tags may be stored in various ways in different types of metadata.
- Phil
Quote from: blue-j on March 10, 2022, 11:15:17 PM
Some metadata fields permit multiple values in them, comma- or semi-colon-separated usually.
To expand a bit more, in the case of list type tags such as
Keywords or
Subject, they are only displayed as comma separated. This is pretty much standard for most programs. But they are stored separate. For example, the raw xmp of the
Subject tag shows that "One" is completely separate from "Two"
<rdf:Description rdf:about=''
xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
<dc:subject>
<rdf:Bag>
<rdf:li>One</rdf:li>
<rdf:li>Two</rdf:li>
</rdf:Bag>
</dc:subject>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Offhand, the only tags I can think of that are comma/semicolon separated are the
XPKeywords (semicolon separated) and one of the PDF tags gets written as comma separated by Adobe (can't remember which). In both these cases, exiftool treats them as string tags and leaves it up to you to do the bookkeeping.
Thanks, fellas! What about fields that can be duplicated records? For example, say, image regions in IPTC Extension? Artwork or Object, Location Shown, etc. The schema permits more than one set of values for those.
- J
The tag names page (https://exiftool.org/TagNames/) documents how the various types of tags are marked in the sub-pages. You can also mouse over the entries on the writable column to get a tool tip if on desk top.
For the more complicated tags (artwork, locations, etc), see the Structured Information page (https://exiftool.org/struct.html). I tend to think of structured tags as if they were index cards with various pieces of data on them. Or you could think of it as a single record in a database or row in a spreadsheet.
If you take a structure extracted with the -struct option (https://exiftool.org/exiftool_pod.html#struct---struct) and break it down, it becomes a bit easier to make since of. In this post (https://exiftool.org/forum/index.php?topic=11988.msg64724#msg64724), I show how a RegionInfo (MWG regions) is set up. The braces { } are use to indicate KEY:VALUE pairs and the brackets [ ] are arrays, usually of more structures, like the RegionList in that example.
Mind blown!!! Merci merci merci!
- J
Forgot to add this. This is how the XMP-iptcExt:LocationShown structure is set up in Adobe Bridge. I'd assume it would be similar for Lightroom.
(https://i.imgur.com/xfg61Qy.png)
If you click the folded corner icon in the "Location Shown" row, it will add another set of "Location" tags where you can enter data. And you can remove a set with the trash icon.
In exiftool, you can see the full structure with the -struct option or view the data with the flattened tags
C:\>exiftool -G1 -a -s -struct -LocationShown y:\!temp\Test4.jpg
[XMP-iptcExt] LocationShown : [{City=New York City,ProvinceState=New York},{City=Los Angeles,ProvinceState=California}]
C:\>exiftool -G1 -a -s -LocationShown* y:\!temp\Test4.jpg
[XMP-iptcExt] LocationShownCity : New York City, Los Angeles
[XMP-iptcExt] LocationShownProvinceState : New York, California
But you have to be careful with the flattened tags, as you won't seen missing data. For example, here I've inserted "Chicago" in the middle without a state. If you try to match City and State through the flattened tags, you'll end up with "Chicago, California".
C:\>exiftool -P -overwrite_original -LocationShown="[{City=New York City,ProvinceState=New York},{City=Chicago},{City=Los Angeles,ProvinceState=California}]" y:\!temp\Test4.jpg
1 image files updated
C:\>exiftool -G1 -a -s -LocationShown* y:\!temp\Test4.jpg
[XMP-iptcExt] LocationShownCity : New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles
[XMP-iptcExt] LocationShownProvinceState : New York, California
Side note, I'm adding all of this so I can't link this thread if a similar question comes up later.