ExifTool Forum

General => Metadata => Topic started by: andrewj on April 21, 2025, 07:41:24 AM

Title: Panasonic Focus Area Size
Post by: andrewj on April 21, 2025, 07:41:24 AM
Hi Phil,

Newer Panasonic cameras store the size of the primary focus area as well as its centre position.

The value appears to be held in the tag Panasonic:Panasonic_0x00de. This is usually a pair of numbers, representing the fractional width and height of the focus area relative to the image size. For example "0.021484375 0.029296875" in a typical image with spot focus, or "0.23046875 0.291015625" in an image where the camera focused on a larger area (e.g. using one of the specialist subject detection modes).

I suggest you call this "AFAreaSize", or you could use "AFPointSize" to correspond with the existing AFPointPosition for the centre point.

Andrew   
Title: Re: Panasonic Focus Area Size
Post by: andrewj on April 24, 2025, 06:30:20 AM
Bump! Could an admin confirm that this update is in order and will be implemented in a coming version?
I have confirmed that it works and replicates on-camera information, I can provide evidence if that helps.
Thanks, Andrew
Title: Re: Panasonic Focus Area Size
Post by: Phil Harvey on April 24, 2025, 02:44:35 PM
There was no need to bump this.  Sorry for the delay in responding, but I'll take a look at it when I get a chance.  I plan to implement it before the next release if it works with my samples here.

- Phil
Title: Re: Panasonic Focus Area Size
Post by: andrewj on April 25, 2025, 06:52:36 AM
Thanks Phil. Sorry if I seemed impatient, but you're normally so good at getting back very promptly!
Title: Re: Panasonic Focus Area Size
Post by: Phil Harvey on April 25, 2025, 06:57:31 AM
We're into bird migration season now, so expect slower responses for the next month or so. :)

- Phil
Title: Re: Panasonic Focus Area Size
Post by: Phil Harvey on April 25, 2025, 04:45:46 PM
Great.  This seems to work well for my samples, and I'll convert the value of "4194303.999 4194303.999" to "n/a" since I see this in a couple of samples.

Thanks for this!

- Phil