Hello Phil,
it's a long time I am using exiftool and I have never understood why the "Lens Serial Number" shown is different from my actual lens serial number.
For example:
exiftool /temp/IMG_6184.CR2 | grep Serial
Internal Serial Number : GD0040687
Serial Number : 023022003733
Lens Serial Number : 0000204d8d
What is the "Internal Serial Number" ?
The serial number of the Digital camera is correct, but my actual lens serial number is 45842 ... how can I convert the number 0000204d8d shown in the exif data? This number is not Hexadecimal!
Please help me!
Thanks! ;)
Many camera manufacturers encrypt the actual serial number of the camera. It is the encrypted number Exiftool is able to show, showing the actual serial would require a known encryption method, but alas this is usually a trade secret and hence unknown :(
@ Hayo Baan
Thank you for your answer!
Waiting for Phil in order to receive another confirmation! ::)
Add the -G1 option to your output. If this is the standard EXIF tag, then the answer is that the camera isn't writing the string properly. If it is a Canon tag, please send me a sample and I'll take a look (philharvey66 at gmail.com).
- Phil
Thank you Phil, email sent. ;)
I got the file, thanks:
> exiftool ~/Desktop/IMG_36176_6d.JPG "-*serial*" -G1
[Canon] Internal Serial Number : GD0040687
[ExifIFD] Serial Number : 023022003733
[ExifIFD] Lens Serial Number : 0000204d8d
The ExifIFD serial number is written incorrectly. This standard EXIF tag should not be encrypted, so it must be considered a Canon bug that it is not stored properly. (If it is encrypted somehow, I don't know how, but then ExifTool wouldn't decrypt it anyway since it is a standard EXIF tag.)
- Phil
Thank you for your opinion Phil!
I will write to Canon USA in order to investigate to that issue.
I will keep you informed.
Regards ;)
Interesting! Seems I may have been wrong about the "many" at least; taking a closer look at the sample images I have available it looks like at least Nikon and Canon have the camera serial number unencrypted. Regarding the lens serial number I can not determine this; Nikon does not seem to record this (or at least not yet in a known tag) and the Canon gear I shoot with that does, records it as 0000000000, but that is likely be because it is a non-Canon lens I used.
@TechnoPhil, are you by any chance also using a non-Canon lens?
@Phil: I noticed that for the Nikon D70, the serial number is written as "NO= xxxxxxxx", perhaps it would be nice to strip off the NO= part?
@Phil: I also noticed that the Nikon D200 doesn't seem to record the serial number in the makernotes, even though the tag is available...
@ Hayo Baan
Sorry, but I only have one lens: EF 28-300 L
Quote from: Hayo Baan on November 02, 2014, 11:44:20 AM
Interesting! Seems I may have been wrong about the "many" at least; taking a closer look at the sample images I have available it looks like at least Nikon and Canon have the camera serial number unencrypted. Regarding the lens serial number I can not determine this; Nikon does not seem to record this (or at least not yet in a known tag) and the Canon gear I shoot with that does, records it as 0000000000, but that is likely be because it is a non-Canon lens I used.
@TechnoPhil, are you by any chance also using a non-Canon lens?
@Phil: I noticed that for the Nikon D70, the serial number is written as "NO= xxxxxxxx", perhaps it would be nice to strip off the NO= part?
@Phil: I also noticed that the Nikon D200 doesn't seem to record the serial number in the makernotes, even though the tag is available...
Right, now I remember again why I said that many manufacturers encrypted the number: over the course of years I have shot with a number
of different Canon 60D camera's (they rotate these between a group of photographers for specific assignments), two of these (ones I used for a long time) showed a weird negative number as serial number. The problem is that I now do not have access to these specific cameras any longer (at least I'm not sure which ones they should be) so I can not determine what the number should have been (perhaps simply the unsigned integer version?).
I noticed that the camera with the negative number used a slightly older (1.1.0 vs 1.1.1) firmware version, so it may have been a firmware bug too...
Added: Ah, the plot thickens: with -a, exifTool reveals another SerialNumber in the makernotes, and this one is not malformed and may in fact be the correct one! I now have two samples for you (makernote, exif):
2181211531 -211375576
2331302326 -196366497
Looking at their hex representation I have not been able to see how to get from one to the other...
Quote from: Hayo Baan on November 02, 2014, 11:44:20 AM
@Phil: I noticed that for the Nikon D70, the serial number is written as "NO= xxxxxxxx", perhaps it would be nice to strip off the NO= part?
Nikon writes a number of tags in string form. In general, ExifTool only messes with the capitalization of these tags (to avoid ugliness in the output), but otherwise doesn't modify the strings. In this case, "NO= " is part of the value stored.
QuoteAdded: Ah, the plot thickens: with -a, exifTool reveals another SerialNumber in the makernotes, and this one is not malformed and may in fact be the correct one! I now have two samples for you (makernote, exif):
I'll take a look at my samples tomorrow and see what I can determine about this.
- Phil
Hello,
this is my discussion with Canon as i promised!
Question:
I discovered a bug in the EXIF data of the image, concerning the Lens Serial Number. DPP does to show the lens serial number of the lens used, but if you use other external programs, you are able to read it. This is an example of EXIF data shown by exiftool:
exiftool /temp/IMG_6184.CR2 | grep Serial
Internal Serial Number : GD0040687
Serial Number : 023022003733
Lens Serial Number : 0000204d8d
What is the "Internal Serial Number" ?
My actual lens serial number is 45842 ... so what is the number 0000204d8d shown?! Is it encrypted? If yes why? I think it could be useful in order to intercept for example a stolen equipment!
Answer from Canon:
You had several questions regarding serial numbers. Unfortunately, the program you use does not come from Canon- it's third party software and isn't supported in any form by Canon. So any of the questions you ask regarding that program, I am not able to answer.
Please let us know if we can be of any further assistance.
;D
Quote from: TechnoPhil on November 03, 2014, 02:32:23 AM
I discovered a bug in the EXIF data of the image, concerning the Lens Serial Number. DPP does to show the lens serial number of the lens used, but if you use other external programs, you are able to read it. This is an example of EXIF data shown by exiftool:
You could try wording your question differently:
"My Canon camera writes a BodySerialNumber in the metadata of the images according to the EXIF specification, however this number does not match the serial number stamped on the body of my camera. Is this expected? If so, what is the meaning of the EXIF BodySerialNumber written by the camera?"I think it is best not to mention exiftool, because I'm sure they are aware of it, and it most certainly causes them grief when it comes to customer support.
- Phil
Quote from: Phil Harvey on November 02, 2014, 07:45:41 PM
Quote from: Hayo Baan on November 02, 2014, 11:44:20 AM
Added: Ah, the plot thickens: with -a, exifTool reveals another SerialNumber in the makernotes, and this one is not malformed and may in fact be the correct one! I now have two samples for you (makernote, exif):
I'll take a look at my samples tomorrow and see what I can determine about this.
For this camera (from imaging-resource.com):
(http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E60D/ZBOTTOM.JPG)
I get this:
> exiftool ~/Desktop/E60DhSLI00100_NR_STD.JPG "-*serial*" -a -G1
[Canon] Serial Number : 0370217391
[Canon] Serial Number Format : Format 2
[Canon] Internal Serial Number : WB0007188
[ExifIFD] Serial Number : 0370217391
[ExifIFD] Lens Serial Number : 0000000000The two serial numbers are correct. Odd that they do not match for your 60D. Definitely a firmware bug I would say, possibly in some signed vs. unsigned integer arithmetic, but I can't see how this would result in the numbers you mentioned.
- Phil
Quote from: Phil Harvey on November 03, 2014, 07:20:31 AM
...
The two serial numbers are correct. Odd that they do not match for your 60D. Definitely a firmware bug I would say, possibly in some signed vs. unsigned integer arithmetic, but I can't see how this would result in the numbers you mentioned.
Yeah, I'm quite sure it was a firmware bug. Signed vs unsigned doesn't appear to be it, nor the one's complement or any other likely thing. Ah well, I think I'll assume the MakerNotes version was correct now :)
Thanks for looking into this!
@TechnoPhil, if your LensSerialNumber is also caused by a firmware bug, perhaps you could see if a newer version is available? If there is one, they should be available from the Canon site.
Thank you all for your help, but I am a little bit confused! :o
If I try:
exiftool /temp/IMG_6184.CR2 | grep Serial
Internal Serial Number : GD0040687
Serial Number : 023022003733
Lens Serial Number : 0000204d8d
I can see my actual camera Serial Number and it's correct, but the only thing not correct il the "Lens Serial Number" (actual: 45842).
My EOS 6D has the latest firmware update (1.1.4).
What is the "Internal Serial Number" ?
I use the same lens (EF 28-300L) from many years, I used it with the EOS 5D and EOS 5D MkII but these cameras does not show the "Lens Serial Number" in the EXIF data.
On the other hands the software Canon Digital Photo Professional has never shown info about "Lens Serial Number", that's why Canon USA answered to my email that they cannot help...
???
I can give you a RAW file in order to test better: https://www.dropbox.com/s/jc44sa1krfk536p/test_IMG_6184.CR2
Thanks
Don't be confused. Hayo is talking about other serial number problems he had with the 60D. These are different than the problems you are having with the 6D.
I don' know what the internal serial number is. Maybe one embedded in the CPU or something.
- Phil
@ Phil
Ok, i thought we were talking about the same thing... now it's ok. ;D
But don't you think that the "Lens Serial Number" shown in my EOS 6D camera's EXIF data is encrypted (that's why it is different from the actual...)?
It should not be encrypted because it is a standard EXIF tag.
I have only ever seen makernote (proprietary) information that is encrypted.
- Phil
Quote from: Phil Harvey on November 03, 2014, 10:34:33 AM
It should not be encrypted because it is a standard EXIF tag.
Understand... so we really don't know what
0000204d8d number mean for "Lens Serial Number" ::)
Yes. That is something that Canon should really answer, if you could phrase the question so that it fits into their narrow mindset.
- Phil
I found other samples on the web... this RAW file of EOS 1Dx:
http://img.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_eos_1d_x/photos/canon_eos_1d_x_01.cr2
The EXIF data of the EOS 1Dx shows the Lens Serial Number correctly!
I think in my case, it could be a bug of my lens EF 28-300L ...
Example of EOS 5D MkIII:
http://www.metrodcphotography.com/raw_files/5D3-5D2-6D-comparison-01/image3-5D3-ISO800.CR2
Another example of EOS 6D:
http://www.metrodcphotography.com/raw_files/5D3-5D2-6D-comparison-01/image3-6D-ISO800.CR2
Both EOS 5D MkIII & EOS 6D shows a "strange" Lens Serial Number.... but the sample of the EOS 1Dx was taken with a very new lens (200-400 L) and the sample of my EOS 6D and other EOS 5DMkIII were taken with very old lenses!
What do you think Phil ?
Sounds plausible. Maybe with your lens the serial number embedded in its chip is just different than the printed serial number for some reason. Perhaps they straightened this out for newer lenses.
- Phil
Yep... maybe Canon changes something with its news lenses... my EF 28-300L was introduced in 2004 ... so it is an old lens too!
I wrote to a trusted Canon Camera Service in Italy, a friend of mine!
I will inform you of his answer! ;)
Another link of EOS 5D MkIII + 200-400 L
http://img1.focus-numerique.com/focus/articles/1688/canon-ef-200-400mm-f4-is-usm-1_4x-exemple1.jpg
It is shown Lens Serial Number & Serial Number of the camera! The lens was introduced in 2012!
Hello Phil,
the camera service here in Italy told me that this Lens Serial Number could be an hexadecimal number, but i told them that i tried to convert it and it is not corresponding to the actual number of my lens!
Anyway they are sure that the old lenses does not report correctly the Serial Number on the EXIF data.
Maybe EXIFTOOL reads another number, for example a CMOS tag or something else.
This answer sounds that nobody there knows the right answer to my question! ???
I'm sure the Canon engineers know, but it is next to impossible to get in touch with the engineers of a large company like Canon. Plus, they have likely signed some non-disclosure contract, so they may not be able to give any details even if you could find them. :(
- Phil