optimisation

Started by Jaff, November 17, 2021, 05:38:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Jaff

November 17, 2021, 05:38:28 AM Last Edit: November 17, 2021, 08:05:37 AM by Jaff
I just run a short optimization on .EXE file. I extracted ZIP archive / repaired (don't ask me why looks corrupted) / extracted files / compressed zip archive using 7ZIP (ZIP/Ultra/deflate/32kb dictionary, 258 byte word) / replaced ZIP in exe file. 8.648k -> 8.245k (403k less in file size) [8.856.383 -> 8.443.466 bytes] (412.917 difference).
This is just a simple optimization of .EXE file. It can be reduced more with ZIP optimisers but anyway... Try to optimize ZIP file from EXE one when releasing (less space on all computers/less bandwidth usage for site). Thank you!

edit: Removed attachment for safety.

Phil Harvey

#1
November 17, 2021, 07:28:09 AM
I wouldn't worry too much about 412 kB when the file size is > 8 MB.

- Phil
...where DIR is the name of a directory/folder containing the images.  On Mac/Linux/PowerShell, use single quotes (') instead of double quotes (") around arguments containing a dollar sign ($).

Jaff

#2
November 17, 2021, 08:10:20 AM
Multiply that at lots of downloads... is something. Maybe not much, but something. Also gives faster load time when is executed. Anyway, better than no optimization. Right?

obetz

#3
November 17, 2021, 08:43:45 AM
Quote from: Jaff on November 17, 2021, 08:10:20 AM
Multiply that at lots of downloads...

with many downloads, it's still only 5% of the total volume of the many downloads. not worth the effort.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions