FLIR Image issues

Started by OrBy, July 02, 2015, 01:24:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

OrBy

1) Your system type (Windows XP, Linux, Mac, etc).
Winx 7 x64

2) The ExifTool version you are using (the output of the "exiftool -ver" command).
9.98

3) The specific command line you are using (or a sample script if having problems with the API).
exiftool IMG_1830.JPG -b -Pallette
and
exiftool IMG_1830.JPG -b -RawThermalImage

4) The console output from the command.
Warning: [minor] Possibly incorrect maker notes offsets (fix by 12?) - IMG_1830.JPG 
and
Warning: [minor] Possibly incorrect maker notes offsets (fix by 12?) - IMG_1830.JPG

5) It is often useful to attach a sample image which exhibits the problem.  (Please keep these files small if possible -- I have limited disk space for this forum.)  Some users have reported problems uploading images to the forum.  If necessary, images may be emailed to me directly (philharvey66 at gmail.com).

Image attached



Background - image looks like it was taken with the new v2 of the FLIR ONE camera. Seems like they have modified the EXIF data a bit again... Not a huge deal but more of a heads up in case others run into issues.

Phil Harvey

Yes, thanks.   And thanks for this sample.  This problem occurs for the FLIR ONE and E30.  I was hoping that FLIR would fix this in a firmware update, but apparently not.  Until then, you should add the -F option to ExifTool to deal with this.

- Phil
...where DIR is the name of a directory/folder containing the images.  On Mac/Linux/PowerShell, use single quotes (') instead of double quotes (") around arguments containing a dollar sign ($).

tomas123

a warning is not a bug  :)
$ exiftool -warning * | grep -B1 Warning
======== FLIR_AX5.jpg
Warning                         : GPS pointer references previous ExifIFD directory
--
======== FLIR_E30.jpg
Warning                         : [minor] Possibly incorrect maker notes offsets (fix by 12?)
--
======== FLIR_E30bx.jpg
Warning                         : [minor] Possibly incorrect maker notes offsets (fix by 532?)
--
======== FLIR_ONE.jpg
Warning                         : [minor] Possibly incorrect maker notes offsets (fix by 12?)
--
======== FLIR_ONEV2-IOS.jpg
Warning                         : [minor] Possibly incorrect maker notes offsets (fix by 12?)
--
======== FLIR_P60PAL.jpg
Warning                         : Bad GPS offset for GPSLatitude
--
======== FLIR_ThermaCAM_E320.jpg
Warning                         : Bad MakerNotes offset for ImageTemperatureMax
--
======== FLIR_ThermaCAM_T-400.jpg
Warning                         : Bad GPS offset for GPSLatitude


for your collection at https://exiftool.org/sample_images.html
I post as attachment two images from a Flir One V2.
With V2 the sensor resolution is enhanced from 80x60 -> 160x120
The embedded PNG has a doubled image size.

$ exiftool -RAWTHERMAL* FLIR_ONE*
======== FLIR_ONE.jpg
Raw Thermal Image Width         : 120
Raw Thermal Image Height        : 160
Raw Thermal Image Type          : PNG
Raw Thermal Image               : (Binary data 19971 bytes, use -b option to extract)
======== FLIR_ONEV2-ANDROID.jpg
Raw Thermal Image Width         : 320
Raw Thermal Image Height        : 240
Raw Thermal Image Type          : PNG
Raw Thermal Image               : (Binary data 52476 bytes, use -b option to extract)
======== FLIR_ONEV2-IOS.jpg
Raw Thermal Image Width         : 240
Raw Thermal Image Height        : 320
Raw Thermal Image Type          : PNG
Raw Thermal Image               : (Binary data 80870 bytes, use -b option to extract)


Source:

Flir One V2 Android http://www.slashgear.com/flir-one-thermal-camera-for-android-hands-on-30391243/
Flir One V2 IOS http://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/actual-resolution-of-flir-one-v2/msg701478/#msg701478