UTM coordinates

[Phil Harvey]

This config file is included in the full distribution.  Here is the current version (no changes since 2016/03/09).

- Phil

[dericson]

This config file is included in the full distribution.  Here is the current version (no changes since 2016/03/09).

- Phil

Do I need to use a utm flag or anything?  I followed the directions as you described, but I am not seeing UTM tags in the response

Yep I was missing "-utm*"

[StarGeek]

What is the exact command you used and the exact output?

Here's an example of what I get using the config

Code Select Expand

C:\>exiftool -config gps2utm.config -G1 -a -s -c "%.6f" -GPS* -UTM* y:\!temp\Test4.jpg
[GPS]           GPSVersionID                    : 2.3.0.0
[GPS]           GPSLatitudeRef                  : North
[GPS]           GPSLatitude                     : 40.689200
[GPS]           GPSLongitudeRef                 : West
[GPS]           GPSLongitude                    : 74.044500
[Composite]     GPSLatitude                     : 40.689200 N
[Composite]     GPSLongitude                    : 74.044500 W
[Composite]     GPSPosition                     : 40.689200 N, 74.044500 W
[Composite]     UTMCoordinates                  : 18T 580735.871m E 4504695.165m N
[Composite]     UTMEasting                      : 580735.870703451
[Composite]     UTMNorthing                     : 4504695.16533812
[Composite]     UTMZone                         : 18T

[Phil Harvey]

You shouldn't have to specify "-utm*" (unless you have specified other tags to extracted).  When extracting all tags, the UTM tags should be generated as long as the config file is used an the GPS coordinates exist.

- Phil

[StarGeek]

You shouldn't have to specify "-utm*" (unless you have specified other tags to extracted).  When extracting all tags, the UTM tags should be generated as long as the config file is used an the GPS coordinates exist.

I only wanted to show the GPS and UTM tags to show that the config file worked. All other tags where unnecessary for the example.

[Phil Harvey]

@StarGeek:  Understood.  My comment was in response to dericson's last post, and was actually composed before I saw yours.

- Phil

[StarGeek]

and was actually composed before I saw yours.

As is tradition...

[Phil Harvey]

[dericson]

I got it up and running.  In the end all I had to do was restart my terminal.  Thanks!!