Fujifilm 0x102e field (C-AF settings)

[greybeard]

0x1446 Flicker Reduction

Only applies to X-T3

Note that this does not apply to Electronic Shutter

There must be information other than Flicker Reduction embedded in this tag

Code used to test:

    0x1446 => {
        Name => 'FlickerReduction',
        Writable => 'int16u',
        ValueConv => q{
           my $hex = sprintf("0x%X", $val);
           my $v1 = ($val >> 12) & 0x0ff;
           my $out="Off";
           if ($v1 == 3) { $out = "On"; }
           $out="$hex : $out";
        },

Samples to follow

[Phil Harvey]

0x1446 Flicker Reduction

Great, thanks!

Here is what I did for this one:

Code Select Expand

> exiftool ~/Desktop/XT* -flickerreduction
======== /Users/phil/Desktop/XT3_Flicker3.JPG
Flicker Reduction               : Off (0x0010)
======== /Users/phil/Desktop/XT3_Flicker4.JPG
Flicker Reduction               : On (0x3110)
    2 image files read

[Phil Harvey]

Going back to the AFArea stuff... I have some samples with Single Point AF, but the area size is zero.  I was thinking of re-doing the decoding to show "n/a" for a zero point size, but is zero actually significant for Single Point mode.  This is what I have after changing it (I also changed "AFMode2" to "AFAreaMode"):

Code Select Expand

======== ../testpics/FujiFilm/X-T3/DRng3.JPG
AF Area Mode                    : Zone
AF Area Point Size              : n/a
AF Area Zone Size               : 3 x 3
======== ../pics/FujiFilmX-T3.jpg
AF Area Mode                    : Single Point
AF Area Point Size              : n/a
AF Area Zone Size               : n/a

- Phil

[greybeard]

Did the example XT3 file with Single Point but no size come from me? I haven't seen any X-T3 file for Single Point or Zone without size.

I wouldn't show the tag with "n/a" - I probably wouldn't show it at all in the same way that other tags that don't exist in the EXIF aren't shown by Exiftool.

Other earlier cameras (such as the X-T2) may show Single Point or Zone from the tag but won't have size in either case.

[greybeard]

0x1401 FilmMode

Additional Film Simulation 0x700 Eterna/Cinema

Example email sent

[greybeard]

0x1048 ColorChromeEffect

X-T3 specific

0 = Off
32 = Weak
64 = Strong

Example jpeg in email

[greybeard]

0x1047 Grain Effect

At least since the X-T2, X-Pro2 and X-H1

0 = Off
32 = Weak
64 = Strong

Example jpeg in email

[greybeard]

0x1045 Lens Modulation Optimizer

Applies to most recent Fuji cameras X-Tx, X-Ex, X-Hx and GFX

0 = Off
1 = On

All the examples sent to date have Lens Modulation Optimizer set to On

[Phil Harvey]

Did the example XT3 file with Single Point but no size come from me?

No.

I wouldn't show the tag with "n/a" - I probably wouldn't show it at all in the same way that other tags that don't exist in the EXIF aren't shown by Exiftool.

But the value does exist (it is zero).  So it is different than tags that don't exist.  The value in showing "n/a" is that the value will be set properly when copying all tags.

- Phil

[greybeard]

But the value does exist (it is zero).  So it is different than tags that don't exist.  The value in showing "n/a" is that the value will be set properly when copying all tags.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding how this works - I thought you were converting a single tag into three "virtual" tags?

I couldn't find an existing example under the FujiFilm Makernotes where a single tag created multiple results.

[Phil Harvey]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding how this works - I thought you were converting a single tag into three "virtual" tags?

I'm decoding this as a binary data block.  NikonCustom.pm has many examples of similar decoding.

I'd send you my working copy of FujiFilm.pm, but I'm currently in the process of changing the way this decoding is done.

- Phil

[Phil Harvey]

0x1401 FilmMode

Additional Film Simulation 0x700 Eterna/Cinema

Added.

0x1048 ColorChromeEffect

Added.

0x1047 Grain Effect

Added.

0x1045 Lens Modulation Optimizer

Added.

Thanks!!

- Phil

[greybeard]

OK good - the only one I still have outstanding is Long Exposure Noise Reduction which I'm still trying to decode consistently.

[Richard_Butler]

Sorry I took my eye of this for a day. The AF-C customization stuff looks great (unless anyone is begging to know which preset was used).

It's amazing to see so all the contributions coming in here.

Let me know if you want me to check whether the GFX 50S and R use the same values for Color Chrome Effect (or send you JPEGs).

R

[Phil Harvey]

Let me know if you want me to check whether the GFX 50S and R use the same values for Color Chrome Effect (or send you JPEGs).

I don't see a need to check this unless you have some reason to suspect it may be different than the X-T3.  But I will probably be releasing the new version tomorrow -- please let me know if you find anything that should be changed or added.

- Phil